Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WSMRX
FSMAX vs WSMRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WSMRX
FSMAX vs WSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WSMRX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WSMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. WSMRX (1.3B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WSMRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WSMRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WSMRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WSMRX (7 years). WSMRX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSMRX: FSMAX (0) vs WSMRX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.01 vs. WSMRX (19.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.68 vs. WSMRX (-18.08).
| FSMAX | WSMRX | FSMAX / WSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.374 | 14.037 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.3B | 3,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.01 | 19.27 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.18 | 8.19 | 857% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.68 | -18.08 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers