Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$128.98
Change-$0.44 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. WWNPX (1.18B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs WWNPX (0.07). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WWNPX (2.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. WWNPX (8.31). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 208.54 vs. FSMAX (50.18).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | -3.331 | -352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 1.18B | 3,508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.07 | 617% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 8.31 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.00 | 53.99 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 208.54 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 294.97 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers