Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$154.60
Change-$8.43 (-5.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. WWNPX (1.52B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (1.10) vs WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (13 years) vs WWNPX (25 years). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 107.04 vs. FSMAX (15.39). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 182.04 vs. FSMAX (41.45).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 15.477 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 1.52B | 2,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 107.04 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 145.01 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | 182.04 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 331.19 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...