Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$127.06
Change-$0.32 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. WWNPX (1.19B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.46) vs WWNPX (0.07). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WWNPX (2.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. FSMAX (21.74). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 181.98 vs. FSMAX (51.34).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.478 | -4.855 | -92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 1.19B | 3,339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.07 | 666% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 29.23 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 62.81 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 181.98 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | 281.89 | 29% |