Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$120.66
Change-$2.87 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. WWNPX (1.11B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.43) vs WWNPX (0.07). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. WWNPX (2.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.46 vs. WWNPX (-24.30). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 158.63 vs. FSMAX (33.47).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.349 | -7.731 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 1.11B | 3,745% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.07 | 610% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | -24.30 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.71 | 17.58 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 158.63 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.83 | 280.58 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement