Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.56
Change+$1.82 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$125.00
Change+$0.54 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WWNPX (1.15B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs WWNPX (0.07). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WWNPX (2.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. WWNPX (12.72). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 200.36 vs. FSMAX (60.52).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.849 | -7.036 | -154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.15B | 3,556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.07 | 623% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.13 | 12.72 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.96 | 53.32 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.52 | 200.36 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.35 | 288.21 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement