Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.19
Change+$0.34 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$162.05
Change-$0.93 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. WWNPX (1.58B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (1.10) vs WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (13 years) vs WWNPX (25 years). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 130.44 vs. FSMAX (24.89). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 207.04 vs. FSMAX (52.43).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.469 | 21.736 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.58B | 2,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.89 | 130.44 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 159.69 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.43 | 207.04 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.27 | 386.30 | 23% |