Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. WWNPX (1.09B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WWNPX (3.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.94 vs. WWNPX (-9.45). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 55.05 vs. FSMAX (33.73).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.403 | 18.043 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.09B | 3,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.94 | -9.45 | -296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.15 | 89.15 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | 55.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.10 | 289.31 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement