Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. WWNPX (1.04B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WWNPX (27 years). WWNPX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WWNPX (3.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. WWNPX (-2.50). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 50.05 vs. FSMAX (40.97).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 14.433 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.04B | 3,841% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | -2.50 | -1,039% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | 48.38 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | 50.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | 259.33 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers