Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WWNPX
FSMAX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WWNPX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. WWNPX (1.13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: FSMAX (0.48) vs WWNPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WWNPX (27 years). WWNPX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WWNPX (3.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: FSMAX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. WWNPX (-4.43). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.00 vs. FSMAX (35.59).
| FSMAX | WWNPX | FSMAX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.64 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 23.261 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 1.13B | 3,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.67 | -4.43 | -580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.76 | 91.62 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.59 | 59.00 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.51 | 299.57 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement