Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FSSMX
FSMDX vs FSSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FSSMX
FSMDX vs FSSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FSSMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FSSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FSSMX (2.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSSMX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FSSMX (0.64). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FSSMX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FSSMX (14 years). FSSMX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FSSMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.95 vs. FSMDX (22.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. FSSMX (18.31).
| FSMDX | FSSMX | FSMDX / FSSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.67 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.67 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 21.275 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 2.54B | 2,026% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.64 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 24.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 53.10 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 18.31 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 86.21 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers