Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FTZCX
FSMDX vs FTZCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FTZCX
FSMDX vs FTZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FTZCX (725M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FTZCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FTZCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FTZCX (5 years). FTZCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZCX: FSMDX (0) vs FTZCX (1000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.59 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FTZCX return over 5 years is better than : 83.61 vs. FSMDX (42.72).
| FSMDX | FTZCX | FSMDX / FTZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 13.119 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 725M | 7,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 38.59 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 97.26 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 83.61 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement