Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FTZCX
FSMDX vs FTZCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FTZCX
FSMDX vs FTZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FTZCX (897M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FTZCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FTZCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FTZCX (5 years). FTZCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZCX: FSMDX (0) vs FTZCX (1000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.48 vs. FSMDX (22.60). FTZCX return over 5 years is better than : 91.72 vs. FSMDX (43.56).
| FSMDX | FTZCX | FSMDX / FTZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 21.810 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 897M | 5,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 45.48 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 108.50 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 91.72 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement