Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FTZFX
FSMDX vs FTZFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FTZFX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$52.92
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.28M
FSMDX vs FTZFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FTZFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and FTZFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. FTZFX (223M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: FSMDX (1.14) vs FTZFX (0.18). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FTZFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FTZFX (6 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: FSMDX (0) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.28 vs. FSMDX (10.79). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 111.90 vs. FSMDX (75.41).
| FSMDX | FTZFX | FSMDX / FTZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.635 | 3.485 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 223M | 18,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.18 | 620% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 13.28 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.21 | 71.51 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.41 | 111.90 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers