Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FTZFX
FSMDX vs FTZFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FTZFX
FSMDX vs FTZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FTZFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and FTZFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. FTZFX (1.05B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: FSMDX (0.76) vs FTZFX (0.10). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FTZFX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FTZFX (8 years). FTZFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: FSMDX (0) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. FSMDX (18.74). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.10 vs. FSMDX (42.85).
| FSMDX | FTZFX | FSMDX / FTZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.89 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.622 | 23.922 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 1.05B | 4,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.10 | 780% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.74 | 42.01 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 100.95 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 96.10 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement