Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$22.94
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and FZAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. FZAMX (1.46B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.14) vs FZAMX (0.56). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. FZAMX (-4.25). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.08 vs. FZAMX (27.06).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.866 | -5.718 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.46B | 2,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.56 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.27 | -4.25 | -242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.17 | 8.66 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.08 | 27.06 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.08 | 14.60 | 761% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement