Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.20
Change+$2.50 (+8.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$20.71
Change+$1.74 (+9.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and FZAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FZAMX (1.43B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.20) vs FZAMX (0.58). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.78 vs. FZAMX (-19.37). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.00 vs. FZAMX (28.85).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.296 | -20.403 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.43B | 2,637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.58 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.78 | -19.37 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.46 | -11.33 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.00 | 28.85 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.28 | -3.82 | -1,972% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...