Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.02B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$25.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jan 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37B vs. FZAMX (1.55B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.28) vs FZAMX (0.45). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (13 years) vs FZAMX (11 years). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMDX (9.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.34 vs. FZAMX (17.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 57.56 vs. FZAMX (31.40).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.827 | 6.253 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37B | 1.55B | 2,382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.45 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.34 | 17.26 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.01 | 17.20 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.56 | 31.40 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.57 | 38.09 | 322% |