Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.59
Change+$0.18 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$23.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. FZAMX (1.51B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.31) vs FZAMX (0.54). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. FZAMX (-5.70). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.17 vs. FZAMX (32.10).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.111 | -2.509 | -204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.51B | 2,810% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.54 | 243% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | -5.70 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.92 | 23.99 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.17 | 32.10 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.56 | 18.03 | 652% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement