Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.80
Change-$0.07 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$23.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. FZAMX (1.52B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.29) vs FZAMX (0.53). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.95 vs. FZAMX (3.80). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.88 vs. FZAMX (25.21).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.476 | -1.481 | -437% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 1.52B | 2,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.53 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.95 | 3.80 | 420% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | 15.32 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.88 | 25.21 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.76 | 20.93 | 591% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement