Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. FZAMX (2.3B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (0.76) vs FZAMX (0.27). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FZAMX (13 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FZAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.85 vs. FSMDX (19.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. FZAMX (22.42).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 23.703 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 2.3B | 2,312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.27 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 27.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 42.02 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 22.42 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 65.15 | 254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers