Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FZAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FZAMX (2.12B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FZAMX (0.29). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FZAMX (13 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FZAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.03 vs. FSMDX (22.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. FZAMX (21.65).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 24.271 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 2.12B | 2,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.29 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 34.03 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 51.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 21.65 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 76.36 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers