Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZFLX
FSMDX vs FZFLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZFLX
FSMDX vs FZFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZFLX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FZFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. FZFLX (4.16B). FZFLX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: FZFLX (2.27) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZFLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs FZFLX (11 years). FZFLX (0.13) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FZFLX (9.00). FSMDX (0) and FZFLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. FZFLX (-13.18). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. FZFLX (-61.76).
| FSMDX | FZFLX | FSMDX / FZFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.05 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.13 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 26.563 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 4.16B | 1,252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 2.27 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | -13.18 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 6.09 | 1,044% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | -61.76 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | -38.23 | -436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement