Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMAX
FSMDX vs GCMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMAX
FSMDX vs GCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. GCMAX (1.15B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GCMAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs GCMAX (0.67). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GCMAX (29 years). GCMAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMAX: FSMDX (0) vs GCMAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.15 vs. GCMAX (6.61). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. GCMAX (-6.76).
| FSMDX | GCMAX | FSMDX / GCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.19 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.891 | 14.799 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 1.15B | 4,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.67 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.15 | 6.61 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.66 | 18.20 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.98 | -6.76 | -621% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.37 | 19.61 | 848% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers