Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMRX
FSMDX vs GCMRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMRX
FSMDX vs GCMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GCMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GCMRX (1.13B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GCMRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs GCMRX (0.55). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GCMRX (18 years). GCMRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and GCMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GCMRX (0.38). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GCMRX (-11.79).
| FSMDX | GCMRX | FSMDX / GCMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 13.819 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.13B | 4,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.55 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 0.38 | 3,456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 18.94 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -11.79 | -342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 13.35 | 1,251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers