Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMUX
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMUX
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMUX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GCMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GCMUX (1.17B). FSMDX (0.99) and GCMUX (0.96) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMUX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GCMUX (11 years). GCMUX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMUX: FSMDX (0) vs GCMUX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. GCMUX (12.49). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. GCMUX (-2.37).
| FSMDX | GCMUX | FSMDX / GCMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 15.923 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.17B | 4,390% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.96 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 12.49 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 25.81 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | -2.37 | -1,840% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 32.79 | 548% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers