Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMXAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$30.83
Change+$0.26 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Idx A
Price$13.99
Change+$0.11 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.01M
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMXAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GMXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. GMXAX (466M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMXAX: FSMDX (1.20) vs GMXAX (1.01). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMXAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GMXAX (25 years). GMXAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.74 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMXAX: FSMDX (0) vs GMXAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.53 vs. GMXAX (-12.21). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.65 vs. GMXAX (24.58).
| FSMDX | GMXAX | FSMDX / GMXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.67 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.476 | -11.650 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 466M | 8,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.01 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | -12.21 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.96 | -15.97 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.65 | 24.58 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.80 | -23.17 | -362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...