Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMXAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GMXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GMXAX (490M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMXAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs GMXAX (0.72). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMXAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GMXAX (27 years). GMXAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMXAX (15.69) and FSMDX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMXAX: FSMDX (0) vs GMXAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. GMXAX (12.75). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. GMXAX (-8.20).
| FSMDX | GMXAX | FSMDX / GMXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | 15.141 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 490M | 10,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | 12.75 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.87 | 17.87 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.87 | -8.20 | -535% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.20 | 11.84 | 1,505% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement