Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMXAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GMXAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GMXAX (485M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMXAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs GMXAX (0.72). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMXAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GMXAX (26 years). GMXAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMXAX (15.69) and FSMDX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMXAX: FSMDX (0) vs GMXAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. GMXAX (11.85). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. GMXAX (-11.21).
| FSMDX | GMXAX | FSMDX / GMXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 12.945 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 485M | 10,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 11.85 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 16.08 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -11.21 | -381% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 6.45 | 2,583% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement