Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMXAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GMXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GMXAX (470M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMXAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs GMXAX (0.64). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMXAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GMXAX (27 years). GMXAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMXAX (15.69) and FSMDX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMXAX: FSMDX (0) vs GMXAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GMXAX (-0.15). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GMXAX (-11.14).
| FSMDX | GMXAX | FSMDX / GMXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 12.004 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 470M | 11,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.64 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -0.15 | -8,597% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 11.61 | 484% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -11.14 | -362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 4.32 | 3,864% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers