Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMXAX
FSMDX vs GMXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMXAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GMXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. GMXAX (480M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMXAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs GMXAX (0.64). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMXAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GMXAX (27 years). GMXAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMXAX (15.69) and FSMDX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMXAX: FSMDX (0) vs GMXAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. GMXAX (7.31). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. GMXAX (-9.92).
| FSMDX | GMXAX | FSMDX / GMXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.622 | 14.207 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 480M | 10,854% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.64 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.74 | 7.31 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 7.94 | 631% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | -9.92 | -432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.64 | 5.11 | 3,244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement