Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GMXRX
FSMDX vs GMXRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMXRX
FSMDX vs GMXRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMXRX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GMXRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GMXRX (480M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMXRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs GMXRX (0.40). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMXRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GMXRX (20 years). GMXRX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMXRX (15.69) and FSMDX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMDX (0) and GMXRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.94 vs. GMXRX (2.55). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. GMXRX (-11.27).
| FSMDX | GMXRX | FSMDX / GMXRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.03 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.895 | 14.812 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 480M | 11,063% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.40 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.94 | 2.55 | 665% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.17 | 12.75 | 464% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | -11.27 | -380% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.90 | 2.55 | 6,694% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement