Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GSMCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GSMCX (1.13B). GSMCX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GSMCX (0.92) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GSMCX (31 years). GSMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMDX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GSMCX (2.10). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GSMCX (-5.80).
| FSMDX | GSMCX | FSMDX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 14.302 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.13B | 4,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.92 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 2.10 | 630% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 23.33 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -5.80 | -695% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 26.10 | 640% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement