Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GSMCX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GSMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GSMCX (1.14B). FSMDX (0.99) and GSMCX (0.96) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GSMCX (31 years). GSMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMDX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.26 vs. GSMCX (8.99). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.36 vs. GSMCX (-5.53).
| FSMDX | GSMCX | FSMDX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.696 | 12.875 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.14B | 4,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.96 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.26 | 8.99 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.89 | 23.22 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.36 | -5.53 | -730% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.96 | 25.10 | 657% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement