Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GVCAX
FSMDX vs GVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GVCAX
FSMDX vs GVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GVCAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GVCAX (247M). GVCAX (1.01) and FSMDX (0.99) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than GVCAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GVCAX (16 years). GVCAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. GVCAX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GVCAX: FSMDX (0) vs GVCAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. GVCAX (14.89). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. GVCAX (-17.76).
| FSMDX | GVCAX | FSMDX / GVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.47 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.47 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 8.122 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 247M | 20,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.01 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 14.89 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 27.06 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | -17.76 | -245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | -11.40 | -1,576% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers