Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GVCAX
FSMDX vs GVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GVCAX
FSMDX vs GVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GVCAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GVCAX (254M). GVCAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GVCAX (0.96) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GVCAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GVCAX (16 years). GVCAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. GVCAX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GVCAX: FSMDX (0) vs GVCAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GVCAX (9.17). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GVCAX (-12.69).
| FSMDX | GVCAX | FSMDX / GVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.47 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.47 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 13.013 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 254M | 20,906% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.96 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 9.17 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 31.48 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -12.69 | -318% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -9.87 | -1,692% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers