Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWGZX
FSMDX vs GWGZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWGZX
FSMDX vs GWGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWGZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GWGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. GWGZX (796M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GWGZX: FSMDX (0.76) vs GWGZX (0.17). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWGZX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWGZX (9 years). GWGZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWGZX: FSMDX (0) vs GWGZX (5000000). GWGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. FSMDX (19.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. GWGZX (22.15).
| FSMDX | GWGZX | FSMDX / GWGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 16.796 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 796M | 6,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.17 | 457% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 20.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 39.01 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 22.15 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers