Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWGZX
FSMDX vs GWGZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWGZX
FSMDX vs GWGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWGZX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GWGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GWGZX (767M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GWGZX: FSMDX (0.99) vs GWGZX (0.17). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWGZX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWGZX (9 years). GWGZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWGZX: FSMDX (0) vs GWGZX (5000000). GWGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.62 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. GWGZX (20.62).
| FSMDX | GWGZX | FSMDX / GWGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 13.219 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 767M | 6,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.17 | 564% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 24.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 42.44 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 20.62 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers