Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWGZX
FSMDX vs GWGZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWGZX
FSMDX vs GWGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWGZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GWGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GWGZX (740M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GWGZX: FSMDX (0.75) vs GWGZX (0.17). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWGZX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWGZX (10 years). GWGZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWGZX: FSMDX (0) vs GWGZX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GWGZX (9.50). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GWGZX (13.79).
| FSMDX | GWGZX | FSMDX / GWGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 12.856 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 740M | 7,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.17 | 436% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 9.50 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 37.96 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 13.79 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement