Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWSAX
FSMDX vs GWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWSAX
FSMDX vs GWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWSAX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GWSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. GWSAX (44.4M). GWSAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GWSAX (5.21) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWSAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWSAX (24 years). GWSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWSAX: FSMDX (0) vs GWSAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.14 vs. GWSAX (6.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.77 vs. GWSAX (20.68).
| FSMDX | GWSAX | FSMDX / GWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.326 | 4.382 | 350% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 44.4M | 119,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 5.21 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.14 | 6.52 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.87 | 26.12 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.77 | 20.68 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.44 | 72.27 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers