Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWSAX
FSMDX vs GWSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWSAX
FSMDX vs GWSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GWSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GWSAX (46.4M). GWSAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GWSAX (5.09) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWSAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWSAX (23 years). GWSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWSAX: FSMDX (0) vs GWSAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. GWSAX (16.91). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. GWSAX (28.63).
| FSMDX | GWSAX | FSMDX / GWSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 8.493 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 46.4M | 110,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 5.09 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 16.91 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 38.06 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 28.63 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 73.16 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement