Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWSCX
FSMDX vs GWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWSCX
FSMDX vs GWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GWSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. GWSCX (45.5M). GWSCX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GWSCX (4.90) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWSCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWSCX (23 years). GWSCX (2.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWSCX: FSMDX (0) vs GWSCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. GWSCX (10.74). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. GWSCX (18.36).
| FSMDX | GWSCX | FSMDX / GWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.41 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.41 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | 5.504 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 45.5M | 113,187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 4.90 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | 10.74 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.87 | 29.14 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.87 | 18.36 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.20 | 62.74 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers