Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GWSCX
FSMDX vs GWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GWSCX
FSMDX vs GWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GWSCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GWSCX (45.5M). GWSCX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GWSCX (4.68) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GWSCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GWSCX (24 years). GWSCX (2.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWSCX: FSMDX (0) vs GWSCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GWSCX (4.54). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GWSCX (17.78).
| FSMDX | GWSCX | FSMDX / GWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.41 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.41 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 7.042 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 45.5M | 116,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 4.68 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 4.54 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 24.48 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 17.78 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 56.99 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers