Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HEQCX
FSMDX vs HEQCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HEQCX
FSMDX vs HEQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HEQCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HEQCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. HEQCX (17.8M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HEQCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs HEQCX (0.41). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HEQCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HEQCX (15 years). HEQCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEQCX: FSMDX (0) vs HEQCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. HEQCX (10.04). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. HEQCX (-13.59).
| FSMDX | HEQCX | FSMDX / HEQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.622 | 12.547 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 17.8M | 292,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.41 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.74 | 10.04 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 4.53 | 1,105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | -13.59 | -315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.64 | 9.61 | 1,723% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement