Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HEQCX
FSMDX vs HEQCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HEQCX
FSMDX vs HEQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HEQCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HEQCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. HEQCX (17.4M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HEQCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs HEQCX (0.40). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HEQCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HEQCX (15 years). HEQCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEQCX: FSMDX (0) vs HEQCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. HEQCX (0.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. HEQCX (-14.07).
| FSMDX | HEQCX | FSMDX / HEQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 10.325 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 17.4M | 305,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.40 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 0.96 | 1,388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 7.03 | 800% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -14.07 | -286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 9.14 | 1,827% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers