Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs HFDCX
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$30.10
Change-$1.10 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$15.88
Change-$0.50 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets929.76M
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. HFDCX (930M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: FSMDX (1.20) vs HFDCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDCX (8 years). HFDCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDCX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. HFDCX (-9.20). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.82 vs. HFDCX (29.08).
| FSMDX | HFDCX | FSMDX / HFDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.92 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.92 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.610 | -9.101 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 930M | 4,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.30 | -9.20 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.14 | -4.32 | -235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.82 | 29.08 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers