Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDCX
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$18.14
Change+$0.24 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets984.07M
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. HFDCX (984M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: FSMDX (1.26) vs HFDCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDCX (9 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDCX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. HFDCX (-2.10). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.01 vs. HFDCX (22.73).
| FSMDX | HFDCX | FSMDX / HFDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.771 | 0.666 | 1,467% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 984M | 4,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | -2.10 | -687% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 14.74 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.01 | 22.73 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement