Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDCX
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.28
Change+$0.43 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$18.05
Change+$0.20 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.13M
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDCX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. HFDCX (983M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: FSMDX (1.31) vs HFDCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDCX (9 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDCX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. HFDCX (-1.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 69.76 vs. HFDCX (23.70).
| FSMDX | HFDCX | FSMDX / HFDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.417 | -0.943 | -680% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 983M | 4,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | -1.60 | -778% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.49 | 12.48 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.76 | 23.70 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement