Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDCX
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$33.81
Change-$0.82 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.69B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.30
Change-$0.38 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.33M
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.7B vs. HFDCX (983M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: FSMDX (1.21) vs HFDCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDCX (9 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDCX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. HFDCX (-2.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 83.18 vs. HFDCX (33.33).
| FSMDX | HFDCX | FSMDX / HFDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.547 | -1.887 | -135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7B | 983M | 3,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -2.86 | -310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.34 | 12.54 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.18 | 33.33 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement