Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDFX
FSMDX vs HFDFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.75
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$19.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.88M
FSMDX vs HFDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. HFDFX (975M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: FSMDX (1.29) vs HFDFX (0.42). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDFX (8 years). HFDFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDFX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. HFDFX (2.83). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.56 vs. HFDFX (27.75).
| FSMDX | HFDFX | FSMDX / HFDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.268 | -0.103 | -6,089% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 975M | 4,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.42 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 2.83 | 591% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.73 | 12.72 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.56 | 27.75 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement