Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDFX
FSMDX vs HFDFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDFX
FSMDX vs HFDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HFDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. HFDFX (1.08B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: FSMDX (0.75) vs HFDFX (0.41). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDFX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HFDFX (10 years). HFDFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDFX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.19 vs. HFDFX (12.95). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.07 vs. HFDFX (6.47).
| FSMDX | HFDFX | FSMDX / HFDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.812 | 16.088 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.08B | 4,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.41 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.19 | 12.95 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.26 | 29.12 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.07 | 6.47 | 635% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement