Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R4
Price$19.86
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets966.79M
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. HFDSX (967M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: FSMDX (1.25) vs HFDSX (0.04). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDSX (9 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and HFDSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.87 vs. HFDSX (-2.90). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 66.87 vs. HFDSX (27.69).
| FSMDX | HFDSX | FSMDX / HFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.196 | 2.856 | 392% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 967M | 4,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.04 | 3,426% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.87 | -2.90 | -375% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.37 | 26.47 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.87 | 27.69 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement