Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R4
Price$18.98
Change-$0.21 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.26M
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDSX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. HFDSX (974M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: FSMDX (1.29) vs HFDSX (0.04). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDSX (9 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and HFDSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. HFDSX (0.51). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.33 vs. HFDSX (25.46).
| FSMDX | HFDSX | FSMDX / HFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.120 | -0.363 | -1,684% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 974M | 4,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.04 | 3,501% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.07 | 0.51 | 2,756% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.77 | 12.24 | 292% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.33 | 25.46 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement