Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. HFDSX (1.06B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: FSMDX (0.99) vs HFDSX (0.14). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HFDSX (10 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and HFDSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. HFDSX (15.57). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. HFDSX (5.66).
| FSMDX | HFDSX | FSMDX / HFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 13.967 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.06B | 4,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.14 | 724% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 15.57 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 27.15 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 5.66 | 755% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement