Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDSX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. HFDSX (1.11B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: FSMDX (0.76) vs HFDSX (0.13). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HFDSX (10 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and HFDSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. HFDSX (18.49). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. HFDSX (8.78).
| FSMDX | HFDSX | FSMDX / HFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 19.862 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 1.11B | 4,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.13 | 577% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 18.49 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 32.32 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 8.78 | 537% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement