Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCLX
FSMDX vs HMCLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCLX
FSMDX vs HMCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HMCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. HMCLX (207M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCLX: FSMDX (0.99) vs HMCLX (0.58). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HMCLX (7 years). HMCLX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCLX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCLX (50000). HMCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.53 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. HMCLX (28.31).
| FSMDX | HMCLX | FSMDX / HMCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.93 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 12.131 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 50000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 207M | 24,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.58 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 24.53 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 42.27 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 28.31 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement