Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCNX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Harbor Mid Cap Investor
Price$15.52
Change+$0.06 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.61M
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCNX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HMCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. HMCNX (171M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMDX (1.25) vs HMCNX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HMCNX (6 years). HMCNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. HMCNX (4.02). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.97 vs. HMCNX (47.76).
| FSMDX | HMCNX | FSMDX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.29 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.196 | 6.301 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 171M | 26,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | 4.02 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 27.10 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.97 | 47.76 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers