Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HMCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. HMCNX (234M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMDX (0.76) vs HMCNX (0.30). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). HMCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.34 vs. FSMDX (19.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. HMCNX (30.76).
| FSMDX | HMCNX | FSMDX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 15.404 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 234M | 22,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.30 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 21.34 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 36.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 30.76 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers