Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCNX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HMCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. HMCNX (202M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMDX (0.75) vs HMCNX (0.30). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). HMCNX (17.77) and FSMDX (16.94) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. HMCNX (27.31).
| FSMDX | HMCNX | FSMDX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.895 | 15.854 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 202M | 26,287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.30 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.94 | 17.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.17 | 42.04 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 27.31 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers