Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCNX
FSMDX vs HMCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCNX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HMCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. HMCNX (209M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: FSMDX (0.76) vs HMCNX (0.31). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HMCNX (7 years). HMCNX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCNX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCNX (2500). FSMDX (23.19) and HMCNX (22.78) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.48 vs. HMCNX (31.64).
| FSMDX | HMCNX | FSMDX / HMCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.875 | 19.127 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 209M | 24,928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.31 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.19 | 22.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.29 | 45.37 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.48 | 31.64 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement