Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCRX
FSMDX vs HMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCRX
FSMDX vs HMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HMCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. HMCRX (223M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCRX: FSMDX (0.99) vs HMCRX (0.65). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HMCRX (7 years). HMCRX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCRX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCRX (1000000). HMCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.40 vs. FSMDX (22.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. HMCRX (35.62).
| FSMDX | HMCRX | FSMDX / HMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 16.496 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 223M | 23,094% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.65 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 27.40 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 47.50 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 35.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers