Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HMCRX
FSMDX vs HMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HMCRX
FSMDX vs HMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HMCRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and HMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. HMCRX (200M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HMCRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs HMCRX (0.63). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HMCRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs HMCRX (7 years). HMCRX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMCRX: FSMDX (0) vs HMCRX (1000000). HMCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. HMCRX (27.71).
| FSMDX | HMCRX | FSMDX / HMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 13.864 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 200M | 26,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 15.73 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 40.80 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 27.71 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers