Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IPMSX
FSMDX vs IPMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IPMSX
FSMDX vs IPMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IPMSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IPMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. IPMSX (797M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IPMSX: FSMDX (0.75) vs IPMSX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IPMSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IPMSX (25 years). IPMSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IPMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IPMSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. IPMSX (8.47). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. IPMSX (-6.30).
| FSMDX | IPMSX | FSMDX / IPMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 7.526 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 797M | 6,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.19 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 8.47 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 29.83 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -6.30 | -640% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 22.48 | 743% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers