Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IPMSX
FSMDX vs IPMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IPMSX
FSMDX vs IPMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IPMSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and IPMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. IPMSX (826M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IPMSX: FSMDX (0.76) vs IPMSX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IPMSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IPMSX (25 years). IPMSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IPMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IPMSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. IPMSX (17.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. IPMSX (-2.54).
| FSMDX | IPMSX | FSMDX / IPMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 10.971 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 826M | 6,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.19 | 396% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 17.46 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 34.69 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | -2.54 | -1,860% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 22.10 | 755% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers