Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IPMSX
FSMDX vs IPMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IPMSX
FSMDX vs IPMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IPMSX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IPMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. IPMSX (827M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IPMSX: FSMDX (0.99) vs IPMSX (0.20). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IPMSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IPMSX (25 years). IPMSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IPMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IPMSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.01 vs. IPMSX (19.43). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.57 vs. IPMSX (-5.60).
| FSMDX | IPMSX | FSMDX / IPMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.350 | 9.079 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 827M | 6,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.20 | 503% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.01 | 19.43 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.69 | 32.24 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.57 | -5.60 | -760% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.37 | 26.65 | 654% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers