Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMAX
FSMDX vs IRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port A
Price$10.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
FSMDX vs IRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. IRMAX (1.02B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMAX: FSMDX (1.26) vs IRMAX (0.72). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMAX (18 years). IRMAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. IRMAX (0.00). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.64 vs. IRMAX (-1.15).
| FSMDX | IRMAX | FSMDX / IRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.533 | -4.978 | -191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 1.02B | 4,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.22 | 0.00 | 485,510% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 1.83 | 2,572% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.64 | -1.15 | -6,135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.96 | -26.82 | -522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement