Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMAX
FSMDX vs IRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMAX
FSMDX vs IRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. IRMAX (764M). IRMAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: IRMAX (1.08) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMAX (19 years). IRMAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. IRMAX (-20.64). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. IRMAX (-36.92).
| FSMDX | IRMAX | FSMDX / IRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.09 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | -20.093 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 764M | 6,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -20.64 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | -14.26 | -394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -36.92 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -36.45 | -458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers