Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMAX
FSMDX vs IRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMAX
FSMDX vs IRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. IRMAX (701M). IRMAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: IRMAX (1.12) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMAX (18 years). IRMAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. IRMAX (-14.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. IRMAX (-35.71).
| FSMDX | IRMAX | FSMDX / IRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.09 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | -21.194 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 701M | 7,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | -14.23 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | -12.51 | -474% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -35.71 | -120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | -36.41 | -458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement