Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.86
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
Price$10.34
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets593.93M
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and IRMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. IRMCX (594M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMCX: FSMDX (1.26) vs IRMCX (0.90). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.88 vs. IRMCX (-9.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.61 vs. IRMCX (-10.65).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.79 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.595 | -6.749 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 594M | 7,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.90 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | -9.96 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.96 | -1.33 | -2,932% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.61 | -10.65 | -456% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.06 | -25.51 | -506% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers