Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
Price$10.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets628.46M
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. IRMCX (628M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMCX: FSMDX (1.25) vs IRMCX (0.89). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. IRMCX (-1.10). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.97 vs. IRMCX (3.41).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.79 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.196 | -2.604 | -430% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 628M | 7,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | -1.10 | -1,070% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 7.92 | 657% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.97 | 3.41 | 2,112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.92 | -19.99 | -730% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers