Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
Price$10.65
Change+$0.10 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. IRMCX (1.02B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMCX: FSMDX (1.26) vs IRMCX (0.90). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. IRMCX (1.00). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.01 vs. IRMCX (2.62).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.79 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.771 | -4.046 | -242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 1.02B | 4,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.90 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | 1.00 | 1,447% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 4.41 | 1,076% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.01 | 2.62 | 2,707% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.48 | -21.95 | -640% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement