Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
Price$10.04
Change-$0.09 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.8M
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. IRMCX (957M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMCX: FSMDX (1.14) vs IRMCX (0.96). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMCX (17 years). IRMCX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. IRMCX (-0.09). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 80.53 vs. IRMCX (8.54).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.79 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.027 | -8.731 | -46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 957M | 4,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.96 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.00 | -0.09 | -15,271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.72 | 0.64 | 6,481% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.53 | 8.54 | 944% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.77 | -30.45 | -374% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement