Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.28
Change+$0.43 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
Price$10.48
Change+$0.13 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. IRMCX (1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMCX: FSMDX (1.31) vs IRMCX (0.93). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMCX (17 years). IRMCX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. IRMCX (-0.63). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 69.76 vs. IRMCX (2.07).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.79 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.417 | -6.749 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1B | 4,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | -0.63 | -1,968% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.49 | 1.09 | 3,910% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.76 | 2.07 | 3,375% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.39 | -27.06 | -460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement