Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and IRMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. IRMCX (787M). FSMDX (0.75) and IRMCX (0.74) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMCX (19 years). IRMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. IRMCX (-14.65). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.51 vs. IRMCX (-32.43).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.222 | -15.283 | -113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 787M | 6,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.74 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.34 | -14.65 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.68 | -8.16 | -732% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.51 | -32.43 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.93 | -30.79 | -539% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement