Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. IRMCX (808M). FSMDX (0.76) and IRMCX (0.75) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.19 vs. IRMCX (-11.16). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.48 vs. IRMCX (-29.55).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.875 | -13.311 | -149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 808M | 6,448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.75 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.19 | -11.16 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.29 | -6.02 | -1,051% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.48 | -29.55 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.39 | -28.54 | -611% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement