Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMCX
FSMDX vs IRMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. IRMCX (703M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs IRMCX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMCX (18 years). IRMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.88 vs. IRMCX (-12.83). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.25 vs. IRMCX (-32.56).
| FSMDX | IRMCX | FSMDX / IRMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.294 | -18.758 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 703M | 7,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.76 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.88 | -12.83 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.23 | -10.69 | -517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.25 | -32.56 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.81 | -29.25 | -587% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers