Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMTX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S2
Price$10.05
Change+$0.07 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMTX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. IRMTX (1.01B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMTX: FSMDX (1.31) vs IRMTX (0.79). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMTX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMTX (16 years). IRMTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. IRMTX (1.66). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 77.61 vs. IRMTX (4.39).
| FSMDX | IRMTX | FSMDX / IRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.149 | -7.413 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.01B | 4,215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.79 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.74 | 1.66 | 949% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.53 | 3.21 | 1,481% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.61 | 4.39 | 1,769% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.19 | -30.56 | -400% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement