Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMTX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S2
Price$10.21
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. IRMTX (1.02B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than IRMTX: FSMDX (1.31) vs IRMTX (0.79). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMTX: FSMDX (14 years) vs IRMTX (16 years). IRMTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. IRMTX (1.24). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.40 vs. IRMTX (3.18).
| FSMDX | IRMTX | FSMDX / IRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.584 | -5.279 | -163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.02B | 4,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.79 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 1.24 | 1,225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.45 | 2.51 | 1,851% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.40 | 3.18 | 2,372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.19 | -28.60 | -448% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement