Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMTX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and IRMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. IRMTX (709M). IRMTX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: IRMTX (1.14) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMTX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMTX (17 years). IRMTX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.06 vs. IRMTX (-12.76). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. IRMTX (-32.14).
| FSMDX | IRMTX | FSMDX / IRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | -19.247 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 709M | 7,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.14 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.06 | -12.76 | -181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.46 | -15.27 | -344% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | -32.14 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.51 | -33.03 | -519% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers