Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMTX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and IRMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. IRMTX (764M). IRMTX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: IRMTX (1.11) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMTX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMTX (18 years). IRMTX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. IRMTX (-19.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. IRMTX (-35.26).
| FSMDX | IRMTX | FSMDX / IRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | -19.051 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 764M | 6,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.11 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -19.67 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | -12.51 | -449% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -35.26 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -34.08 | -490% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers