Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs IRMTX
FSMDX vs IRMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. IRMTX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and IRMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. IRMTX (709M). IRMTX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: IRMTX (1.12) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than IRMTX: FSMDX (15 years) vs IRMTX (17 years). IRMTX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). IRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and IRMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. IRMTX (-15.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. IRMTX (-32.71).
| FSMDX | IRMTX | FSMDX / IRMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | -18.173 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 709M | 7,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.12 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | -15.14 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | -14.62 | -359% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | -32.71 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | -34.40 | -482% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers