Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
Janus Henderson Contrarian D
Price$28.50
Change+$0.39 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.42B
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. JACNX (4.43B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (1.14) vs JACNX (0.44). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (14 years) vs JACNX (25 years). JACNX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. JACNX (4.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. JACNX (48.27).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.64 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.64 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | 2.888 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 4.43B | 913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.44 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 4.67 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 22.47 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 48.27 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | 45.21 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement