Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$32.12
Change+$0.14 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Janus Henderson Contrarian D
Price$25.31
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.37B
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JACNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. JACNX (4.37B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (1.20) vs JACNX (0.46). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (14 years) vs JACNX (25 years). JACNX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. JACNX (-5.61). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 69.41 vs. JACNX (37.77).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.64 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.64 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.301 | -8.773 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 4.37B | 861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.46 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | -5.61 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.71 | -1.35 | -1,459% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.41 | 37.77 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.87 | 23.05 | 407% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...