Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. JACNX (5.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (0.75) vs JACNX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JACNX (27 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. JACNX (0.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. JACNX (-1.72).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 16.592 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 5.1B | 1,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.19 | 395% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 0.86 | 1,543% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 21.12 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -1.72 | -2,343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 77.71 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement