Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. JACNX (5.18B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (0.99) vs JACNX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JACNX (26 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMDX (22.60) and JACNX (22.12) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. JACNX (7.96).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 24.086 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 5.18B | 995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.19 | 521% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 22.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 31.42 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 7.96 | 548% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 107.93 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers