Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. JACNX (4.88B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (0.99) vs JACNX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JACNX (26 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). JACNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.88 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. JACNX (7.42).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 22.371 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 4.88B | 1,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.19 | 521% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 23.88 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 31.61 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 7.42 | 576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 95.02 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement