Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. JACNX (5.49B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (0.76) vs JACNX (0.18). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JACNX (26 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. JACNX (8.51). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. JACNX (2.83).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 18.456 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 5.49B | 969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.18 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 8.51 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 18.52 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 2.83 | 1,622% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 85.81 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement