Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JACNX
FSMDX vs JACNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JACNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and JACNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. JACNX (5.04B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JACNX: FSMDX (0.76) vs JACNX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JACNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JACNX (27 years). JACNX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JACNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JACNX: FSMDX (0) vs JACNX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. JACNX (9.87). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. JACNX (3.37).
| FSMDX | JACNX | FSMDX / JACNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.65 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 19.612 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 5.04B | 1,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.19 | 395% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 9.87 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 26.05 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 3.37 | 1,398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 79.57 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement