Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JCNAX
FSMDX vs JCNAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JCNAX
FSMDX vs JCNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JCNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and JCNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. JCNAX (5.18B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JCNAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs JCNAX (0.04). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JCNAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JCNAX (17 years). JCNAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JCNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCNAX: FSMDX (0) vs JCNAX (2500). FSMDX (22.60) and JCNAX (21.69) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. JCNAX (6.43).
| FSMDX | JCNAX | FSMDX / JCNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 23.920 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 5.18B | 995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.04 | 2,696% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 21.69 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 30.22 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 6.43 | 678% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 102.72 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers