Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JCNCX
FSMDX vs JCNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JCNCX
FSMDX vs JCNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JCNCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JCNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. JCNCX (5.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JCNCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs JCNCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JCNCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JCNCX (17 years). JCNCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JCNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCNCX: FSMDX (0) vs JCNCX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. JCNCX (-1.76). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. JCNCX (-10.84).
| FSMDX | JCNCX | FSMDX / JCNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.63 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.63 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 15.843 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 5.1B | 1,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -1.76 | -754% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 13.10 | 429% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -10.84 | -372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 50.69 | 329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers