Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JCNCX
FSMDX vs JCNCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JCNCX
FSMDX vs JCNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JCNCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and JCNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. JCNCX (5.49B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JCNCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs JCNCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JCNCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JCNCX (17 years). JCNCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JCNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCNCX: FSMDX (0) vs JCNCX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. JCNCX (5.70). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. JCNCX (-6.71).
| FSMDX | JCNCX | FSMDX / JCNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.63 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.63 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 17.873 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 5.49B | 969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 5.70 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 10.69 | 491% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | -6.71 | -684% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 57.58 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers