Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JCNRX
FSMDX vs JCNRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JCNRX
FSMDX vs JCNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JCNRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JCNRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. JCNRX (5.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JCNRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs JCNRX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JCNRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JCNRX (17 years). JCNRX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JCNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCNRX: FSMDX (0) vs JCNRX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. JCNRX (-0.62). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. JCNRX (-7.19).
| FSMDX | JCNRX | FSMDX / JCNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.37 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 15.989 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 5.1B | 1,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -0.62 | -2,136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 16.50 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -7.19 | -561% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 60.27 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers