Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JMCCX
FSMDX vs JMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JMCCX
FSMDX vs JMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JMCCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and JMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. JMCCX (5.93B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JMCCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs JMCCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JMCCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JMCCX (17 years). JMCCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JMCCX: FSMDX (0) vs JMCCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. JMCCX (-0.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. JMCCX (2.70).
| FSMDX | JMCCX | FSMDX / JMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.73 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 7.154 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 5.93B | 895% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -0.52 | -2,534% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 24.92 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 2.70 | 1,492% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 43.75 | 382% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers