Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs JMCCX
FSMDX vs JMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs JMCCX
FSMDX vs JMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. JMCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and JMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. JMCCX (6.17B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than JMCCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs JMCCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than JMCCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs JMCCX (17 years). JMCCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). JMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JMCCX: FSMDX (0) vs JMCCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. JMCCX (5.55). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. JMCCX (7.50).
| FSMDX | JMCCX | FSMDX / JMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.73 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 9.885 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 6.17B | 862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 5.55 | 354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 23.83 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 7.50 | 612% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 45.60 | 364% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers