Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LGOAX
FSMDX vs LGOAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LGOAX
FSMDX vs LGOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LGOAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LGOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. LGOAX (1.57B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LGOAX: FSMDX (1.14) vs LGOAX (0.06). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LGOAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LGOAX (16 years). LGOAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LGOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGOAX: FSMDX (0) vs LGOAX (1000). LGOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. FSMDX (13.00). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 80.53 vs. LGOAX (56.49).
| FSMDX | LGOAX | FSMDX / LGOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.76 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.027 | 3.359 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.57B | 2,580% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.06 | 1,999% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.00 | 18.49 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.72 | 47.44 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.53 | 56.49 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.77 | 87.69 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement