Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs LGOAX
FSMDX vs LGOAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LGOAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.36
Change+$0.41 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
FSMDX vs LGOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LGOAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LGOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. LGOAX (1.27B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LGOAX: FSMDX (1.20) vs LGOAX (0.06). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LGOAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LGOAX (16 years). LGOAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LGOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGOAX: FSMDX (0) vs LGOAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. LGOAX (-2.80). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.96 vs. LGOAX (60.17).
| FSMDX | LGOAX | FSMDX / LGOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.76 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.351 | -16.951 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.27B | 2,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.06 | 2,007% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | -2.80 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.80 | -2.87 | -411% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.96 | 60.17 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.27 | 48.83 | 175% |