Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LGOAX
FSMDX vs LGOAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LGOAX
FSMDX vs LGOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LGOAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LGOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. LGOAX (2.05B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LGOAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs LGOAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LGOAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LGOAX (18 years). LGOAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LGOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGOAX: FSMDX (0) vs LGOAX (1000). LGOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.81 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. LGOAX (29.48).
| FSMDX | LGOAX | FSMDX / LGOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.69 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.69 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 13.638 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 2.05B | 2,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 17.81 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 106.93 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 29.48 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 212.38 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers