Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap
Price$28.88
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets691.16M
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. LLSCX (691M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LLSCX: FSMDX (1.29) vs LLSCX (0.11). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LLSCX (36 years). LLSCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. LLSCX (8.73). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.33 vs. LLSCX (30.76).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.120 | 5.556 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 691M | 6,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.11 | 1,211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.07 | 8.73 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.77 | 24.69 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.33 | 30.76 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.75 | 9.67 | 1,259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement