Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap
Price$28.49
Change+$0.40 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.65M
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. LLSCX (678M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LLSCX: FSMDX (1.14) vs LLSCX (0.11). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LLSCX (36 years). LLSCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. LLSCX (10.54). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. LLSCX (74.44).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | 2.668 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 678M | 5,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.11 | 1,055% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 10.54 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 24.32 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 74.44 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | 1.49 | 7,864% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement