Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. LLSCX (632M). LLSCX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: LLSCX (1.24) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LLSCX (37 years). LLSCX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. LLSCX (-5.62). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. LLSCX (7.06).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | -5.844 | -256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 632M | 8,418% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.24 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | -5.62 | -350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 19.34 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 7.06 | 650% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 2.92 | 5,683% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers