Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. LLSCX (600M). LLSCX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: LLSCX (1.25) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LLSCX (38 years). LLSCX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. LLSCX (-8.79). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. LLSCX (7.06).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | -8.388 | -165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 600M | 8,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.25 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -8.79 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 15.97 | 352% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 7.06 | 571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -0.41 | -40,408% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement