Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. LLSCX (656M). LLSCX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: LLSCX (1.24) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LLSCX (37 years). LLSCX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. LLSCX (-0.57). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. LLSCX (3.24).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | -5.535 | -217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 656M | 7,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | -0.57 | -3,922% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 27.21 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 3.24 | 1,320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 5.24 | 3,182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement