Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMNOX
FSMDX vs LMNOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMNOX
FSMDX vs LMNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMNOX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LMNOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. LMNOX (1.55B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMNOX: FSMDX (1.14) vs LMNOX (0.24). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMNOX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LMNOX (25 years). LMNOX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNOX: FSMDX (0) vs LMNOX (1000000). LMNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.18 vs. FSMDX (12.60). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. LMNOX (59.08).
| FSMDX | LMNOX | FSMDX / LMNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.48 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.52 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | 2.595 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.55B | 2,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.24 | 485% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 18.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 48.90 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 59.08 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | 100.41 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement