Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMNOX
FSMDX vs LMNOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMNOX
FSMDX vs LMNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMNOX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LMNOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. LMNOX (2.12B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMNOX: FSMDX (0.75) vs LMNOX (0.13). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMNOX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LMNOX (26 years). LMNOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNOX: FSMDX (0) vs LMNOX (1000000). LMNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.13 vs. FSMDX (18.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. LMNOX (33.21).
| FSMDX | LMNOX | FSMDX / LMNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.030 | 17.333 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 2.12B | 2,507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.13 | 566% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.23 | 25.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 110.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.07 | 33.21 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.52 | 227.44 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers