Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMNOX
FSMDX vs LMNOX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMNOX
FSMDX vs LMNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMNOX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LMNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. LMNOX (1.96B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMNOX: FSMDX (0.99) vs LMNOX (0.14). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMNOX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LMNOX (26 years). LMNOX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNOX: FSMDX (0) vs LMNOX (1000000). LMNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.00 vs. FSMDX (22.95). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. LMNOX (10.12).
| FSMDX | LMNOX | FSMDX / LMNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | 7.436 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.96B | 2,632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.14 | 695% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | 35.00 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.87 | 102.78 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.87 | 10.12 | 434% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.20 | 265.08 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers